The argument against tobacco censorship
Category:
science
Duration:
5:30
Description:
Tobacco harm reduction must be driven by quality science and data, irrespective of the source of that science and data. This short commentary looks at scientific censorship, and argues that with robust protocols to manage potential conflicts of interest and rigorous peer review all science can and should be judged on its merits objectively.
Author: Sarah Cooney
Co-Authors: Claire Brough
Organisation: British American Tobacco
Funding: British American Tobacco
Keywords: #TobaccoHarmReduction #scientificcensorship #peerreviewprocess #scientificintegrity #transparency
Format: interview